Helping a Loved One Get a Tourist Visa to USA

Posted on Updated on

Happy indian adult people couple
Parents visting children in USA

What does it take to help your family member, loved one, or friend a U.S. tourist visa to come for a visit?  How can you help smooth the process?  Recently, AdviseHub, the leading provider of immigration solutions, CEO Sanjay Yadgirkar, was describing that parents and friends visiting the United States for the first time find the process overwhelming and asked me to simplify the Visitor visa process. So here are the tips which can help you determine the qualification process and how we can help you.

The B-2 Visa is available for individuals who want to come to the United States.  Some countries have treaties with the U.S. that make tourist visas valid up to 10 years.  When a tourist comes to the US, if granted admission, the tourist typically will be permitted to stay 6 months, with the option of applying for a 6 month renewal for a maximum validity of 1 year.

Some of the things it is OK for a B-2 tourist to do are visit friends and relatives; tourism; engage in recreational activities; rest and relax; seek medical treatment; participate in service and volunteer activities;, and, attend conventions.  If the tourist wants to conduct business activities the proper status is B-1 Visa.

Tourists are not allowed to work or get paid in the U.S.  Also, tourists must have “nonimmigrant” intent: they must not intend to remain in the U.S. through adjustment of status to become a permanent resident (having a “green card”) or to overstay the B status and become illegal.  If the consular officer at the interview, or the CBP officer at the airport or other port of entry, suspects the applicant has immigrant intent, the visa or entry will be denied.

It is important for the tourist to show strong ties to his or her home country as evidence of nonimmigrant intent.  Large amounts of savings, property ownership, employment, business ownership, or close dependent family members,  could be evidence of nonimmigrant intent.

What happens if the tourist isn’t rich?  One thing he or she could consider is having a person who has legal immigration status in the U.S. file an optional “Affidavit of Support” on the tourist’s behalf.  This is a form that the visa applicant would bring to the consular interview for the tourist visa. It shows that a U.S. sponsor has promised to make certain commitments for your visit such as providing room, board, round-trip airplane tickets, and/or spending money.  That person can also guarantee that they will ensure that the potential tourist returns home at the end of the visit.

An experienced immigration attorney can help you figure out the B-2 process: provide advice about which documents to gather; write a cover letter to notify the Department of State that the U.S. person is represented; prepare Form I-134; create a PDF package for the visa applicant that includes an attorney cover letter, Form G-28 Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney, Form I-134, a letter of support from the sponsor with supporting documents; and, advise you as­ needed.

If you are the visa applicant, an attorney could write a letter on your behalf and help you gather supporting documents to bring to your interview, even if a U.S. sponsor is not necessary for your situation.

SophiAlcorn

Sophie Alcorn – Immigration Lawyer

Sophie Alcorn is a Silicon Valley immigration lawyer focused on founders, talent and investors.  She is an active member of the AdviseHub Immigration Lawyer Network.  Her firm handles H-1B visa for a startup or an E-2 investor visa.  If you are thinking about founding a startup in Mountain View or getting a visa for an incubator program, her firm can assist you with obtaining a B-1 visitor for business visa. Also experienced in O-1s, J-1s and J-1 waivers, and L visas, they give you step-by-step guidance on this U.S. immigration law process-and helps you maximize your chance of receiving your desired immigration status.

 

Advertisements

5 Tips to Lower Costs and Maximize Your Visiting Relative’s Travel Medical Insurance

Posted on Updated on

133_Screen_Shot_2015-08-06_at_2.25.06_PMBy Ryan J. Smith

 Your relatives are coming to visit which means there is a lot to do! While you’re busy cleaning out the spare room, patching leaks on the inflatable mattress, and asking your boss for time off to take your relatives to the nearest national park, you’re probably also scouring the web for deals on Visitor Health Insurance. With so many options, finding the right plan can be overwhelming, as if you need to be a specialist in insurance to select the right one. To help ease this burden and make the task of purchasing less arduous, we asked G1G CEO, Zubair Jeewanjee, who often has relatives visiting from abroad, to provide his best tips. He outlined the top 5 insider tricks to make the process easy and affordable, while still protecting the ones you love.

Read the rest of this entry »

Startup Visa Announced – New Updates

Posted on Updated on

Girl_laptop

President Obama announced new regulations today aimed at helping startup founders have a new legal pathway to living in the US.

SophiAlcorn
Sophie Alcorn Alcorn Immigration Law

Under this new proposal, investors, researchers and entrepreneurs who will establish a startup could qualify.

The founder would be required to show either that they have been awarded substantial U.S. investor financing or “otherwise hold the promise of innovation and job creation through the development of new technologies or the pursuit of cutting edge research.” To receive the status, the founder must demonstrate factors such as investment and job-creation to receive temporary parole.

The legal mechanism behind this proposed rule would be the “public-benefit” provision parole regulation. The purpose is to “encourage entrepreneurs to create and develop start-up entities in the United States with high growth potential to create jobs for U.S. workers and benefit the U.S. economy.” This rule will help attract entrepreneurs to the U.S. and increase U.S. competitiveness.

In terms of a founder’s long-term immigration prospects, a track record from this “Startup Visa” could lead to “meeting eligibility requirements for existing nonimmigrant or immigrant classifications.”

The public is invited to learn more about the startup visa at a free event:


Title: Significant Public Benefit Parole for Entrepreneurs

Abstract:
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is proposing to establish a program that would allow for consideration of parole into the United States, on a case-by-case basis, of certain inventors, researchers, and entrepreneurs who will establish a U.S. start-up entity, and who have been awarded substantial U.S. investor financing or otherwise hold the promise of innovation and job creation through the development of new technologies or the pursuit of cutting edge research. Based on investment, job-creation, and other factors, the entrepreneur may be eligible for temporary parole.

Agency: Department of Homeland Security(DHS) Priority: Other Significant
RIN Status: Previously published in the Unified Agenda Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Stage
Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: No
CFR Citation: 8 CFR 212.5
Legal Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5)(A)
Legal Deadline: None

Statement of Need:
The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) authorizes the Secretary, in the exercise of discretion, to parole arriving aliens into the United States on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit. INA section 212(d)(5), 8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5). No existing regulation explains how DHS determines what provides a significant public benefit to the U.S. economy. This regulation clarifies this standard with respect to entrepreneur parolees.

This regulation focuses specifically on the significant economic public benefit provided by foreign entrepreneurs because of the particular benefit they bring to the U.S. economy. However, the full potential of foreign entrepreneurs to benefit the U.S. economy is limited by the fact that many foreign entrepreneurs do not qualify under existing nonimmigrant and immigrant classifications. Given the technical nature of entrepreneurship, and the limited guidance to date on what constitutes a significant public benefit, DHS believes that it is necessary to establish the conditions of such an economically-based significant public benefit parole by regulation. Combined with a unique application process, the goal is to ensure that the high standard set by the statute authorizing significant public benefit parole is uniformly met across adjudications.

In this rule, DHS is proposing to establish the conditions for significant public benefit parole with respect to certain entrepreneurs and start-up founders backed by U.S. investors or grants. DHS believes that this proposal, once implemented, would encourage entrepreneurs to create and develop start-up entities in the United States with high growth potential to create jobs for U.S. workers and benefit the U.S. economy. U.S. competitiveness would increase by attracting more entrepreneurs to the United States. This proposal provides a fair, transparent, and predictable framework by which DHS will exercise its discretion to adjudicate, on a case-by-case basis, such parole requests under the existing statutory authority at INA section 212(d)(5), 8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5).

Lastly, this proposed rule provides a pathway, based on authority currently provided to the Secretary, for entrepreneurs to develop businesses in the United States, create jobs for U.S. workers, and, at the same time, establish a track record of experience and/or accomplishments. Such a track record may lead to meeting eligibility requirements for existing nonimmigrant or immigrant classifications.

Summary of the Legal Basis:
The Secretary’s authority for this proposed regulatory amendment can be found in the Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Law 107-296, section 102, 116 Stat. 2135, 6 U.S.C. 112, and INA section 103, 8 U.S.C. 1103, which give the Secretary the authority to administer and enforce the immigration and nationality laws, as well as INA section 212(d)(5), 8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5), which refers to the Secretary’s discretionary authority to grant parole and provides DHS with regulatory authority to establish terms and conditions for parole once authorized.

Alternatives:
Anticipated Costs and Benefits:
DHS estimates the costs of the rule are directly linked to the application fee and opportunity costs associated with requesting significant public benefit parole. DHS does not estimate there will be any negative impacts to the U.S. economy as a result of this rule. Economic benefits can be expected from this rule, because some number of new ventures and research endeavors will be conducted in the United States that otherwise would not. It is reasonable to assume that investment and research spending on new firms associated with this proposed rule will directly and indirectly benefit the U.S. economy and job creation. In addition, innovation and research and development spending are likely to generate new patents and new technologies, further enhancing innovation. Some portion of the immigrant entrepreneurs likely to be attracted to this parole program may develop high impact firms that can be expected to contribute disproportionately to job creation.

Risks:
Timetable:
Action Date FR Cite
NPRM 12/00/2015
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: None
Federalism: No
Included in the Regulatory Plan: Yes
International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of international interest.
RIN Data Printed in the FR: No
Agency Contact:
Kevin J. Cummings
Chief, Business and Foreign Workers Division
Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Office of Policy and Strategy, 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20529-2140
Phone:202 272-8412202 272-8412
Fax:202 272-1480
Email: kevin.j.cummings@uscis.dhs.gov

What HR Legal needs to know about – Intermittent Employees and I-9 Issues

Posted on Updated on

Law Office of Sweta Khandelwal
Law Office of Sweta Khandelwal

Occasionally, a company requires an intermittent employee to complete a certain project or goal.  A foreign national on an H-1B or L-1 visa may be employed in the US for a short period of time. Regardless of how long a particular employee stays or how often they come in and out of the United States, an employee in the United States must comply with I-9 requirements, , even if they are paid by a foreign employer.

Attend HR Immigration Compliance Workshop by Sweta Khandelwal . Click here for details

An employer must ensure, at a minimum, that Section 2 of Form I-9 is completed within three days of the employee commencing employment.  Sometimes an overseas employee may enter the US for the limited duration of a project and leave US without completing the I-9 Form. In such a situation, the employee must complete the Form I-9 upon their next arrival in the United States.  However, this does not always cure the violation; the employer may find themselves in trouble with E-Verify standards.

A common misconception by employers is that rules/laws regarding worksite compliance do not apply to foreign employees. This is not true. Although for an employee  on a foreign payroll the missing Form I-9 may not come up in an I-9 audit, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement may find it in their own audit; or if company tax records are scrutinized.

On a separate note, complying with the IRS tax requirements for both the employer and employee can be a very complicated process, requiring an analysis of the employee’s primary residence, the days spent in the United States, current income tax guidelines, the employee’s income, and other factors.  It is imperative to check with a CPA.

Having a foreign employee work in the US requires the assistance of an expert immigration attorney, irrespective of the duration of employment in the US. Contact our office if you need assistance with hiring a foreign employee, I-9 compliance, or any other immigration issues.

Changes to H1-B and L-1A Filing fees. New Updates!

Posted on Updated on

SophiAlcorn
Sophie Alcorn Immigration Lawyer

BY IN Immigration On 11-10-2015

On September 30, 2015, Public Law 111-230 sunset. Since 2010, this law has required additional filing fees of $2,000 for certain H-1B petitions and $2,250 for certain L-1A and L-1B petitions. H-1B status is for nonimmigrants working temporarily in specialty occupations; L-1A status is for intracompany transferee managers and executives; and L-1B status is for intracompany transferees with specialized knowledge.

The PL 111-230 fee used to apply to companies with over 50 employees, at least 50% of whom were in H-1B, L-1A or L-1B status. The company had to pay this fee for any new H1-B or L petitions or for an H-1B or L-1 nonimmigrant change employers to come work for them.

These fees no longer apply to any petitions filed on or after October 1, 2015. It is unclear whether and when Congress will reauthorize this law and if so, when the fees might go back into effect, or if the fees would increase. Currently, USCIS is accepting Form I-129 for H-1Bs and L-1 without this fee, even if the company has over 50 employees, 50% of whom are H-1B or L-1 nonimmigrants.

What this means: if you have a compL1-Aany with more than 50 employees and at least 50% of them are on H-1B or L-1 status, this is a great opportunity. Since it is not the H-1B cap-subject lottery season (which takes place next winter for applications for new H-1Bs to be filed starting on April 1, 2016), you could take advantage of hiring a current H-1B or L-1 nonimmigrant either full-time with a change of employer, or by adding hiring him or her for part-time concurrent employment, without being subject to the PL 111-230 fee.

The current H-1B filing fees that remain, in the absence of the PL 111-230:

  • The Form I-129 base fee is $325.
  • If this H-1B is initial H-1B petition on behalf of a particular beneficiary, a change of status to H-1B or change of H-1B employer, or the first petition requesting an extension of H-1B stay by the same petitioner filing on behalf of the same beneficiary, it is subject to the American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act of 1998. The ACWIA fee is $750 for corporations that have fewer than 25 employees, and $1,500 for corporations that have 25 or more employees. The ACWIA fee is not required for some simple amendments, second or later extensions, colleges, nonprofits, schools, and certain other employers.
  • New H-1Bs and transfers to new employers, including new concurrent employment but not renewals or extensions, are subject to the Fraud Prevention and Detection fee of $500.
  • If you need fast turnaround, USCIS offers premium processing for an additional $1,225. They will adjudicate the petition in 15 days or refund this money.

The current L-1 filing fees that remain, in the absence of the PL 111-230:

  • The Form I-129 base fee is $325.
  • New L-1s and transfers to new employers, including new concurrent employment but not renewals or extensions, are subject to the Fraud Prevention and Detection fee of $500. If you are filing a petition for a beneficiary to change status from L-1A to L-1B or from L-1B to L-1A, this fee isn’t required. It is only required for an employer seeking an initial L-1 for an individual.
  • If you need fast turnaround, USCIS offers premium processing for an additional $1,225. They will adjudicate the petition in 15 days or refund this money.

There are even more details for the fees for Chileans, Singaporeans, and people returning to a job they had previously, so if any of these situations apply you should definitely consult with an attorney.

Congress could decide to reauthorize the PL 111-230 fee, but there doesn’t appear to be any movement on this right now. So, if you’re from a large company with a lot of H1-B and L employees and you are considering hiring a new employee currently in H1-B status and not subject to the cap, or in L-1 status, this could be a great opportunity for you to save $2,000 or more on the process.

Visa/Immigration Webinar for Startups, Companies, & Individual

Posted on

AdviseHub_Webinar_Image

AdviseHub is pleased to invite you to attend a free webinar on “Visa & Immigration options for Startups, Companies, and Individuals”

Host: AdviseHub, Inc.
When: Friday, September 18th at 11:30 AM – 1:00 PM
Where: Webinar
Phone: 408-548-0462

Note*: RSVP here confirm your spot.

AdviseHub immigration software & legal marketplace founder Sanjay Yadgirkar, along with guest immigration lawyers Ann Cunn and Madhuri Nemali, will discuss various options that need to be considered when hiring foreign workers.

————————————————————

Disclimer: AdviseHub is not a law firm, and the employees of AdviseHub are not acting as your attorney. AdviseHub does not practice law and does not give legal advice.

USCIS’ “Citizenship Public Awareness Initiative” seeks to demystify the immigration process for legal permanent residents

Posted on

USCIS’ “Citizenship Public Awareness Initiative”
USCIS’ “Citizenship Public Awareness Initiative”

The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has launched a Citizenship Public Education and Awareness Initiative, a media campaign that builds on the previous efforts of President Obama’s executive actions on immigration to demystify the naturalization process. The program provides those seeking citizenship with information on the naturalization process, and promotes the importance of U.S. citizenship rights, responsibilities, and educational resources for legal permanent residents (LPRs).

According to the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Immigration Statistics, roughly 8.8 million lawful permanent residents are eligible to apply for citizenship, with an average span of seven years spent as an LPR in the United States.  Green card holders who meet all eligibility requirements may apply for citizenship after five years, or three years if they are married to a U.S. citizen.

The media campaign announced today includes print advertisements in English, Chinese, Vietnamese, and Spanish. This first phase will be supported by online digital advertisements running through the end of August. At the beginning of September, a second phase of the initiative will begin.

USCIS Now Accepting Some H-4 Spouses’ Employment Authorization Applications

Posted on Updated on

USCIS Now Accepting Some H-4 Spouses’ Employment Authorization Applications
USCIS Now Accepting Some H-4 Spouses’ Employment Authorization Applications

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has begun accepting employment authorization applications for certain H-4 dependent spouses of H-1B nonimmigrants seeking employment-based lawful permanent resident (LPR) status. This is a key element of President Obama’s Immigration Accountability Executive Action initiative. USCIS estimates the number of eligible applicants for work authorization under this rule could be as high as 179,600 in the first year and 55,000 annually thereafter.

USCIS issues H-4 visas to immediate family members (spouse and children under 20 years of age) of the H-1B visa holders. To qualify for work authorization, the H-4 applicant’s H-1B spouse must have either an approved I-140, Immigrant Petition, a pending I-140 petition or have been granted an extension of H-1B status under the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-first Century Act of 2000 (AC-21). These extensions are granted to H-1B workers who have filed PERM applications at least 365 days prior to the six-year max out date, have an I-140 petition pending or have an approved I-140 petition.

Under the rule, eligible H-4 dependent spouses must file Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, with supporting evidence and a corresponding $380 fee. USCIS began accepting applications on May 26, 2015. Once USCIS approves the Form I-765 and the H-4 dependent spouse receives an Employment Authorization Document (EAD), he or she may begin working in the U.S.

Supporting evidence to be submitted with Form I-765 includes the following: (1) Evidence of the spousal relationship to the H-1B holder; (2) Evidence that the H-1B holder is the beneficiary of an approved I-140 or has been granted a one-year H-1B extension under AC-21 pursuant to a PERM or I-140 that has been pending for 365 days or more; (3) Evidence that the H-1B beneficiary is currently in H-1B status; and (4) Evidence that the H-4 nonimmigrant spouse is currently in H-4 status.

USCIS has temporarily suspended Premium Processing of H-1B visas in order to implement this new H-4 program.

USCIS Suspends Premium Processing of H-1B Extension Petitions

Posted on

USCIS Suspends Premium Processing of H-1B Extension Petitions
USCIS Suspends Premium Processing of H-1B Extension Petitions
AdviseHub, the legal marketplace and immigration management solution, would like to update you on a recent change in H-1B visa processing. On May 26, 2015, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced it would temporarily suspend premium processing of H-1B extension petitions until July 27, 2015. Premium processing enables employers to request resolution of H-1B extension petitions within 15 calendar days for an additional $1,225 fee. USCIS is taking this measure to devote additional resources to an upcoming influx of Form I-765 applications as part of the H-4 employment authorization program. During this time frame, petitioners will not be able to:
  • File Form I-907;
  • Request for Premium Processing Service;
  • Request for a Form I-129;
  • Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker; or
  • Request an extension of the stay for an H-1B nonimmigrant.
The USCIS states it will continue to monitor its workload closely, and may resume accepting premium processing requests before July 27, 2015, if it determines that it can once again provide customers with the level of service offered with premium processing.

Read the rest of this entry »